Sakshi v union of india
Web2 days ago · The total number of active COVID cases in the country currently stands at 40,215 with more than 7,500 cases recorded in the last 24 hours. As per the data shared by the Union Health Ministry, the ... WebSakshi v. Union of India In this Public Interest Litigation matter, the Supreme Court of India asked the Law Commission to consider certain important issues regarding sexual abuse of children submitted by the petitioner and the feasibility of amendment to 375 and 376 IPC. 7. Rehabilitation of Child Prostitutes:
Sakshi v union of india
Did you know?
WebThe Officiating Secretary, Bar Council of India, Mr. C. R. Balaram filed an affidavit on behalf of the Bar Council of India wherein he states that a ‘National Conference’ of members of the Bar Council of India and State Bar Councils was held on 10th and 11th September, 1994 and a working paper was circulated on behalf of the Bar Council of India by Mr. V.C. Misra, … WebMay 25, 2024 · In the case of RIT Foundation v.Union of India, a series of petitions demanding the need to criminalise marital rape are currently being heard by a bench of the Delhi High Court.A marital rape victim joined the petition as intervener and demanded justice for herself and millions of other married women who are victims of the current patriarchal, …
Web2 days ago · Bhopal, April 12 (IANS) Veteran Congress leader and Rajya Sabha MP Digvijaya Singh has said that Madhya Pradesh party president Kamal Nath will be the chief ministerial candidate unopposed, if the party wins the assembly polls due at the end of this year. While addressing a press conference in Surkhi assembly constituency of Sagar district on ... WebMar 9, 2024 · PUDR v Union of India (1982 SC) – Law School Notes; Excel Wear Etc vs Union Of India (SC 1978) “Gherao” – Jay Engineering Works v. State of West Bengal (1967 Cal) Hydro (Engineers) Pvt. Ltd. v. The Workmen (1968 SC) Kamani Metals & Alloys Ltd. v. Their Workmen (SC 1967) Archives. March 2024; February 2024; January 2024; December 2024 ...
WebNov 25, 2024 · Introduction: The Supreme Court has sought Centre’s response to a PIL which challenged validity of a provision of Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 that prefers father as a natural guardian of children till they attain majority.A bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra issued notice to the Centre after petitioner’s counsel argued that the 1956 … WebThe review petition was referred to a larger bench of three judges and judgment was delivered on 30 – 03 – 1998. The judgment in the review petition pertained to the following points – scope and nature of Articles 32, 142 and 145 (1) of the Constitution of India; and the directions given in the earlier judgment regarding prostitution and ...
WebSakshi v. Union of India Supreme Court In this public interest litigation, the Supreme Court ordered the use of extensive measures to protect children during sexual abuse trials.
WebSakshi Ajeet Kale’s Post Sakshi Ajeet Kale Advocate ILS Law College ‘20 ... [Prashant Lomate & Anr v. Union of India & Ors and connected pleas]. e office unsikaWebIn Sakshi v Union of India, 2 (2004) 5 SCC 518 this Court issued directions in addition to those which were contained in the decision in State of Punjab v Gurmit Singh, (1996) 2 SCC 384. e office unmerWebNATIONAL LEGAL RESEARCH DESK. Sakshi v Union of India (UOI) and Ors. Citations: AIR 2004 SC 3566, 2004 (2) ALD Cri 504. In this petition the Petitioner organisation asked for … e office up loginWebOct 6, 2024 · Enroll the Course on 'The Indian Penal Code IPC' by Mr. V.K Maheshwari - Click Here Appellant's contentions: It was contended that the sexual abuse of children and womenby penetration other than penile/vaginal penetration as penile/anal penetration, finger/vaginal and finger/anal penetration and object and vaginal penetration shall be … drift courses near meWebBikram Chatterji & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. with connected matters 7 of Chartered Accountants of India in sealed cover within seven days from today. 6. A compliance report has been filed on behalf of NOIDA stating as under: “3. It is submitted that in compliance to the said directions, vide Office Order dated 02.08.2024, a Nodal Cell ... eofficev2WebMay 18, 2024 · Union of India (2014) 5 SCC 438 and K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India to recapitulate that gender identity and sexual orientation are intrinsic to one’s personality and denying the Lesbians, gay, bisexual and transgender the right to privacy and a right to choose a sexual partner irrespective of their sex, would be violative of a dignified ... e-office usuWebUnion of India is a landmark judgment by the Supreme Court of India that addresses the rights of victims of sexual assault and… ADV. SAGAR SHRESHT on LinkedIn: A short summary of , Sakshi v. drift creek campground oregon